<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICC Commentaries for Free Download</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/</link>
	<description>Writings about Exegesis and Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Decker</title>
		<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>The value of these (NT) commentaries is not primarily for their theology (though some are useful there as well)---use them for what they&#039;re best for: helpful discussion of the Greek text. Few commentaries work at this level and the more help you get here will be a major boost in grappling with what the text itself actually says. (I&#039;m not commenting on the ot vols here--I&#039;m a *Nt* prof! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The value of these (NT) commentaries is not primarily for their theology (though some are useful there as well)&#8212;use them for what they&#8217;re best for: helpful discussion of the Greek text. Few commentaries work at this level and the more help you get here will be a major boost in grappling with what the text itself actually says. (I&#8217;m not commenting on the ot vols here&#8211;I&#8217;m a *Nt* prof! <img src='http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace and Knowledge &#187; Free Commentaries - Download ICC Volumes</title>
		<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace and Knowledge &#187; Free Commentaries - Download ICC Volumes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>[...] Brian      You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brian      You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>The theology for most of these is not going to be conservative. The men who contributed to the series tended to be liberal.

Nevertheless, I have found Plummer on Luke helpful, and I&#039;ve heard good things about his Corinthians commentaries. Burton on Galatains has a discusssion of sarx worth consulting 
(I forget at the moment whether I ended up agreeing or disagreeing with him).

Others that I&#039;ve seen referenced often are Frame on Thessalonians, Charles on Revelation, and Bigg on the Petrines and Jude.

Steveson in his commentary on Proverbs often spars with Toy on Proverbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theology for most of these is not going to be conservative. The men who contributed to the series tended to be liberal.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I have found Plummer on Luke helpful, and I&#8217;ve heard good things about his Corinthians commentaries. Burton on Galatains has a discusssion of sarx worth consulting<br />
(I forget at the moment whether I ended up agreeing or disagreeing with him).</p>
<p>Others that I&#8217;ve seen referenced often are Frame on Thessalonians, Charles on Revelation, and Bigg on the Petrines and Jude.</p>
<p>Steveson in his commentary on Proverbs often spars with Toy on Proverbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2008/10/10/icc-commentaries-for-free-download/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian

I have Sanday and Headlam on Romans. I got it after reading Custer&#039;s comment in &lt;i&gt;Tools&lt;/i&gt;. I was always under the impression that the &quot;Critical&quot; in the series title was a key, so I have steered away from most of these. However, I have found S &amp; H to have good comments on the Gk as I go along through Romans.

Do you have any comments on the theology, good or bad, of this series?

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian</p>
<p>I have Sanday and Headlam on Romans. I got it after reading Custer&#8217;s comment in <i>Tools</i>. I was always under the impression that the &#8220;Critical&#8221; in the series title was a key, so I have steered away from most of these. However, I have found S &amp; H to have good comments on the Gk as I go along through Romans.</p>
<p>Do you have any comments on the theology, good or bad, of this series?</p>
<p>Maranatha!<br />
Don Johnson<br />
Jer 33.3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
