<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theological Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/</link>
	<description>Writings about Exegesis and Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exegesis and Theology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barth on Historical Criticism</title>
		<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-4572</link>
		<dc:creator>Exegesis and Theology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barth on Historical Criticism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/#comment-4572</guid>
		<description>[...] to exegesis that never moves beyond the historical-critical level [for context see previous two posts]: Taking Jülcher’s work as typical of much modern exegesis, we observe how closely he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to exegesis that never moves beyond the historical-critical level [for context see previous two posts]: Taking Jülcher’s work as typical of much modern exegesis, we observe how closely he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exegesis and Theology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Theological Commentary 2</title>
		<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-4571</link>
		<dc:creator>Exegesis and Theology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Theological Commentary 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/#comment-4571</guid>
		<description>[...] and TheologyWritings about Exegesis and Theology       &#171; Theological Commentary  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and TheologyWritings about Exegesis and Theology       &laquo; Theological Commentary  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Olinger</title>
		<link>http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-4527</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Olinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/2009/12/18/theological-commentary/#comment-4527</guid>
		<description>Boy, this really sounds familiar. 


;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, this really sounds familiar. </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.exegesisandtheology.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

